A couple of weeks back, our team delved into an intriguing investigation concerning the prevalent languages employed by companies for crafting test automation solutions. Among the top contenders in our exploration were Java and TypeScript.

Java stands as a stalwart in the realm of back-end development and corporate environments, owing to its widespread adoption in legacy systems. Technologies like Spring Boot exemplify Java’s stronghold, remaining a preferred choice for constructing back-end REST APIs in enterprise settings. Furthermore, Java boasts a rich ecosystem of open-source testing tools, including stalwarts like Selenium, JMeter, and ZAP. The emergence of newer tools like Playwright has further solidified Java’s position by providing robust support and libraries tailored for the language.

In contrast, TypeScript, an object-oriented variant of JavaScript, has surged in popularity within the full-stack developer community. Leveraging the familiar syntax of JavaScript while adding static typing and other enhancements, TypeScript has garnered significant traction in modern web development.

Without further ado, here are the insights gleaned from our recent poll:

Here’s our distilled conclusion on language selection for test automation:

1. Starting from Scratch without Mobile Test Automation, Performance, and Security Concerns:

If you’re embarking on a new project and prioritize simplicity and versatility over mobile test automation, performance, and security, sticking to TypeScript coupled with Playwright could be your optimal choice.

2. Existing Java-based Frameworks:

For those already entrenched in Java-based frameworks, especially with established infrastructures and workflows, there’s little long-term value in migrating. Stick with what works for you.

3. Transition from Cypress with TypeScript to Playwright:

If you’re currently using Cypress with TypeScript, consider transitioning to Playwright promptly. This move could potentially streamline your test automation efforts without unnecessary delays.

4. Consideration for Playwright with TypeScript and Cucumber Layer:

Planning to utilize Playwright with TypeScript? Incorporating a cucumber layer can enhance test orchestration, especially as support for mobile test automation and other technologies matures.

5. Transition from Other Languages to TypeScript Frameworks:

For teams utilizing languages like C# or Python, contemplating a switch to TypeScript-based frameworks could offer greater flexibility and alignment with modern development practices.

6. Upskilling with TypeScript:

If TypeScript is on your radar, investing in team up skilling through resources like TypeScript playgrounds can accelerate the learning curve and facilitate smoother adoption. You can try it here https://www.typescriptlang.org/play

7. AI-supported Code Writing for Test Automation:

Explore AI-driven solutions for test code generation to streamline your testing process. Nimbal offers a platform that generates test code in various languages, including Java and TypeScript. Sign up and get in touch to explore how AI can augment your test automation efforts at https://tree.nimbal.co.nz

By carefully considering these recommendations, you can tailor your language selection to best align with your project’s requirements and team capabilities.